On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 11:36:06AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 09:52:09AM +0200, Christoph Franke wrote: > > Dave Jones - Thu, Jun 02 2005 15:01:20 -0400: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 08:55:40PM +0200, Christoph Franke wrote: > > > > Dave Jones - Thu, Jun 02 2005 14:25:48 -0400: > > > > > > > > > Is it repeatable ? Does it behave again if you boot with > > > > > exec-shield=0 ? or exec-shield-randomize=0 ? > > > > > > > > Yes, it is repeatable, teamspeak segfaults on every start. Ntpd > > > > segfaults on both build -30 and -31 during boot, but can be restarted > > > > afterwards. Will try a boot with exec-shield=0 tomorrow morning and pass > > > > through the results. > > > > > > Ok. > > > > Oh, staring on teamspeak I didn't instantly see the old fellow came up > > again with the -31 build (booted with "exec-shield=0"). > > > > This occures during compilation of programs as well as on a cronjob > > renicing some processes and is always parallel to the memory.c log > > entries. The older builds all showed up with this, -30 didn't but -31 > > does again. > > I think that was just by chance than by design. > This has dragged on so long, and with no resolution in sight, > that I'm actually getting more and more tempted to backport the > current FC4 kernel (based on 2.6.12rc5) to FC3. > > .. > I'll think it over some more. The actual backporting of FC4 > kernel to FC3 is probably just an afternoons work. Ok, here's something for folks to chew on over the weekend http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/test/ has a 2.6.12rc5 based kernel for FC3. I've not even had chance to test-boot this one yet, so buyer-beware.. There's no guarantee I won't do another 2.6.11 update for FC3 before pushing this out as an update to updates-testing (where it'll sit for a week or two). It all depends on how this works out. Dave
