On Thursday 02 June 2005 11:29 am, Peter J. Stieber wrote: > CF = Christoph Franke > CF>>>>> Ok :-) But could you tell us if you already based this one upon > CF>>>>> 2.6.11.11, which contains some x86_64 fixes? > > DJ = Dave Jones > DJ>>>> Yes, it does include 2.6.11.11 > > CF>>> Great. Ok, another good news is: so far I am > CF>>> unable to reproduce the > CF>>> problem any longer! > CF>>> > CF>>> /home/christoph$ cat davej > CF>>> ./notes/people_to_hug_before_I_die.txt > > IA = Ivan Adzhubey > IA>> Just rebooted fileserver under -30 build, looks > IA>> like running clean, 2 compute nodes also have not > IA>> seen errors since the new kernel installed, quite > IA>> promising I would say. I'll report if I see any errors. > > PS = Peter J. Stieber > PS> Dave, > PS> > PS> I only see -31 in you web content. I must have > PS> missed a version. > PS> > PS> Was there a fix specifically added to address the > PS> x86_64 bad pmd issue, or is it simply masked due > PS> to other changes? > PS> > PS> I'll load 2.6.11-1.31smp and report back. > > I have been running 2.6.11-1.31_FC3smp for over a day and loading the > system in a manner that has caused the bad pmd problem in the past, but > haven't seen the problem :-)) I can confirm, 3 boxes here now running 48 hours under heavy to regular load, no more pmd errors. > Dave, I'm still wondering if a specific patch was added to this version > to address the bad pmd problem? > > Thank for all your efforts, > Pete -- Ivan
