On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 16:06, Marc M wrote: > I am curious as to what some of you guys say to Debian snobs who look > down on Fedora/RH as being less stable. I find that a pretty esoteric > argument/to each their own, but how do you counter that sort of > statement or attitude? I'd ask them to explain the Debian release schedule. My take on it is that what they call stable is not what you want to run - and if you run something that isn't in stable, it is your fault, not theirs if it has problems. -- Les Mikesell les@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
