On Tuesday 19 April 2005 14:28, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am Di, den 19.04.2005 schrieb Reuben D. Budiardja um 19:06: <snip>> > http://www.milter.info/milter-bcc/index.shtml > > once again it is clear that this simple milter is able to distinguish > between different domain mail addresses. So it should perfectly fit for > your needs. > > In addition I suggest to have a look at > > http://www.milter.info/milter-ahead/index.shtml <snip> Okay. Thank you for those. I will take a look more closely. > As David already pointed out, today spammers regularly take the MX host > with less priority as very often those secondary or tertiary servers > lack the anti spam mechanism and protection the primary MX host normally > has. Yes. Thanks to David too. I will look at the URL he sent and take that into consideration. It's a very valid point that the backup server(s) (if I decide that I really need one) should have as good anti spam mechanism as the main. RDB -- Reuben D. Budiardja Dept. Physics and Astronomy University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT/M/MU/P/S d-(++) s: a-- C++(+++) UL++++ P-- L+++>++++ E- W+++ N+ o? K- w--- !O M- V? !PS !PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X R- tv+ b++>+++ DI D(+) G e++>++++ h+(*) r++ y->++++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
