On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Phil Labonte wrote:
I still fail to understand how top posting "interferes with the flow", if you read the original post why do you have to include it in your replies?
because we're having a dialog...
As someone was comparing this to a newspaper... When they publish letters to the editor they do not includes most of the original article...
The author and the respondant do not actually have a dialog, as the ordinarily would if they were having a conversation/
Or when they print multiple stories on the same subject they do not include the orinal story in subsequent stories...
I mean if you cannot follow a post without quoting text...
when I grep through my mailbox for a conversation I had a week ago, it's useful to get the background info out of the same message. If I have to locate the whole thread that's time consuming parcticularly if the conversation takes days...
The 30 to forty regular mailing list subscriptions, plus work mail, plus personal mail, minus spam adds up to 6.9GB since 1995 or about 1,147,565 messages recieved, 23,562 sent. keeping track is easier if people actually bother adhereing to some reasonable conversational rules.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:16:42 +0200, Duncan Lithgow <duncan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<SNIP>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting joelja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2
