I still fail to understand how top posting "interferes with the flow", if you read the original post why do you have to include it in your replies? As someone was comparing this to a newspaper... When they publish letters to the editor they do not includes most of the original article... Or when they print multiple stories on the same subject they do not include the orinal story in subsequent stories... I mean if you cannot follow a post without quoting text... On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:16:42 +0200, Duncan Lithgow <duncan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > oh, look ... another thread on top posting. and if someone at red hat > > would ever take the time to perhaps post a short set of mailing list > > rules at, say, fedora.redhat.com, we wouldn't have to go through this > > again and again and again and again and again ... > (this is an example of trimming content to suit my reply - warning: not > for the lazy!!) > > There is this which a few of us have been working on: > http://www-personal.ksu.edu/~seabra/linux/FedoraRules.html > > It's the FEDORA CORE SUPPORT LIST - UNOFFICIAL USER'S GUIDE and I think > it's very good, but then I've helped write it so I would say that. Check > the archive if you want the history of this. > > (the lack of reems of text below this is again because I trimming > content to suit my reply - warning: not for the lazy!!) > > ;-) Duncan > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > -- Phil Labonte plabonte@xxxxxxxxx
