Matt Florido wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, Matt. With extended search I got 25 hits, all of which were not relevant to yum or updating packages. One was a reference to experiences "as a young pup", eniac, altair, etc., several pointed to messages concerning a book entitled "Practical Unix Programming" and the rest contained references to "pup up the volume". Entering the search query again after an initial return of 0 found, returned 0 -- again, and again, and again.David Curry wrote:
Subject thread says it all.
The basis for my assertion is many experiences trying to find information in fedora archives. Today, I made notes of steps in trying to find information in fedora-config-list archives and conducting quite a few searches for messages dealing with pup. I asked for searches on all sections, on keywords, on title, and on body. I asked for searches of the entire archive and for searches on a couple of individual months. In every case the result was the same - 0 hits. I searched on pup + yum and again 0 hits on pup with a few hits on yum.
[...]
The Red Hat archive search engine is broken, broken, broken.
I've experienced something similar, but it's not broken. Try the extended search or just entering your search query again after it returns the initial 0 found.
Works for me.
I found ~2000 hits for fedora-config-list.
If Fedora archive searches work for you (sometimes) and for Rahul, but not for me then they are not completely broken -- just random, blatantly unreliable events.
but doesn't the mere fact that you had to go through specific "extra" steps to work around the primary search function mean that it is indeed broken on some level? broken == doesn't work according to initial design.
-- Mark ----------------------------------------------------------- Paid for by Penguins against modern appliances(R) Linux User Since 1996 Powered by Mandrake Linux 8.2 & RH Fedora Core 3 ICQ# 27816299
