On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 20:33 -0500, David Curry wrote: > Matt Florido wrote: > > > David Curry wrote: > > > >> Subject thread says it all. > >> The Red Hat archive search engine is broken, broken, broken. I'd agree that it leaves a LOT to be desired. > > I've experienced something similar, but it's not broken. not broken?! ...are we talking about this: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/ I'd call it flaky at best. > If Fedora archive searches work for you (sometimes) and for Rahul, but > not for me then they are not completely broken -- just random, blatantly > unreliable events. The real point of my post is that at least one usable alternative exists: http://marc.10east.com/?l=fedora-list&r=1&w=3 And maybe that's all we need, is one alternative. I'd be easy if that was redhat's site, but it's good and right that others provide support too. What I find much more troubling than redhat's lack of a good archive is the lack of good pointers from anywhere 'officially branded ' _to_ these types of community sites. But I digress... -- Craig Thomas <cjtinhp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
