Re: Problems with rpm database

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Problems with rpm database
• From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:13:16 -0500 (EST)
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS]

Carl Reynolds said:
> I just installed Fedora Core 3 x86_64 on a machine and used rpm to get
> atrpms-kickcstart for the x86_64 architecture.
>
> When I run
> apt-get update
>

Has apt been upgraded to work with Fedora x86_64 yet?

-- 
William Hooper

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Problems with rpm database
    • From: Carl Reynolds

• References:
  • Problems with rpm database
    • From: Carl Reynolds

• Prev by Date: RE: Sendmail question
• Next by Date: Re: xine
• Previous by thread: Problems with rpm database
• Next by thread: Re: Problems with rpm database
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread