I wrote: > > Apache these days is covered by SELinux: I'd say that there's a very > > good chance that you'll need to do some reading and relabelling to get > > that working. In your situation, at least to begin with, I'd strongly > > recommend turning SELinux OFF just for httpd: see > > http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc3/index.html#using-s-c-securitylevel Rahul Sundaram wrote: > I dont think switching off selinux for apache is the right thing to > do. while apache is one of the most complex deamons running linux and > being protected by targetted policy it should just run out of the box > . if you are doing customisations then its better to read the document > and educate yourself rather than just turning the thing off. Long-term, that's good advice. But the original poster isn't currently protected by SELinux, is unlikely to be running an out-of-the-box apache, and wanted to move in under 4 hours. As I said, at least to begin with, he's got other things to worry about. James. -- James Wilkinson | We still have enough spare cardboard sitting around Exeter Devon UK | to send a bus by Parcelforce, although not enough E-mail address: james | wrapping to be sure they wouldn't deliver it broken @westexe.demon.co.uk | into two pieces. -- Alan Cox
