On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 04:33:30PM +0300, Maxim Eremeev wrote: > Hello akonstam, > > Wednesday, February 9, 2005, 3:50:19 PM, you wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:12:12AM -0600, David Hoffman wrote: > >> On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 07:23:44 +0100, Roger Grosswiler <roger@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx schrieb: > >> > > > >> > > Well here is the deal. The managers of the system put users, faculty, > >> > > etc. in different subdirectories. When I use the first smbmount I > >> > > mount not the directory of csldap1 but the directory of all the > >> > > home directories of users of the system. I might be able to live with > >> > > that but it is annoying. Not to make a value judgement but MAC OS X > >> > > allows you to mount using the share: //trinity-tigers/users/csldap1 > >> > > to mount only the home directory of csldap1. > >> > i see 2 problems here: <snip> > > > I recently received a clarification from out Windows people that the > > share is really //trinity-tigers/users so technically smbmount is > > doing what it is advertised to do but Windows 2000 and XP allow you to > > mount one level below the share. I am getting the feeling that > > smbmount will not. > > -- > > Smbmount will not, AFAIK. However what would prevent you from mounting > this share to some directory, say /mnt/trinity_users and then manage > subdirectories giving the each user access to the proper one and > placing symlinks into their home folders? > Regards, > Maxim. > I think that is what I will have to do. -- ------------------------------------------- Aaron Konstam Computer Science Trinity University One Trinity Place. San Antonio, TX 78212-7200 telephone: (210)-999-7484 email:akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx
