On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:55:25 -0500 (EST), William Hooper <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Kam Leo said: > > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:03:58 +0100, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 20:13 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> > >> > >>>> > >>>> Shit happens, I'm just wondering how smartpm handles it. > >>>> > >>> > >>> allegedly better than yum/apt thou that remains untested/unproven > >> s/better/different/ > >> > >> Anything else is matter of personal preference, rsp. propaganda. > >> > >> > >> Ralf > >> > >> > > > > The most popular repositories are already entered into the smart > > configuration files. The release version is set for FC3. A user just needs > > to uncomment the disabled ones to get the desired setup. So why would > > anyone point smart at FC2 repos? > > For the same reason that the OP's FC3 system is looking at FC2 repos, an > accident. Or not realizing that it didn't get updated after you did an > upgrade. Take a look at the archives, it isn't an uncommon problem. > > -- > William Hooper > Those are typically yum or apt users upgrading from previous versions. Majority of posters are not aware of smart.
