In my humble opinion yum is way superior to synaptic, since yum is a VERY easy to use command line tool, and synaptic always died on me, way back months ago when I used to use it. # yum search evolution willl find packages with similar names as 'evolution' or containing the string. Then you can pick what to install with # yum install evolutionyadayada.i386 for example (fictitious package name) (Not that I would generally recommend evolution mind you , but that's another conversation entirely...) Meanwhile to update the entire system you just say # yum update Yum will figure out your dependencies for you and then ask you do you want to proceed yes or no. All you have to do is make sure you get a really good yum.conf file that points to some good repositiories. This question has been addressed in the archives; search for 'yum.conf' and you will find further info. Cheers Marc On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:34:23 -0500, Temlakos <temlakos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Not a dumb question. no i have never tried anything other than synaptic. > > the reason is because early on a friend recommended it synaptic. he's > > the same guy that recomended FC3. > > > > is yum superior to synaptic? > > > > What is the group opinion on the best way to keep FC3 updated? > > > > mike h > > Advantages of apt and synaptic: > > 1. Shows you packages that are available, that you haven't already > installed. > > 2. Automatically resolves dependencies. > > Does yum do these things? > > And what is the name of yum's GUI front-end? > > Temlakos > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >
