Re: building kernel rpm from src.rpm

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: building kernel rpm from src.rpm
• From: Satish Balay <balay@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:29:09 -0600 (CST)
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Kevin Flynn wrote:

> Should I be using LOCALVERSION to identify the kernel as custom,
> or should I just stick to modifying the release field in the spec
> file as suggested there (it's more intuitive how to modify
> LOCALVERSION) ?  Any ideas what's causing this problem?

I just modify the release tag in the spec file. So far I've attempted
to make most of the .config changes from the specfile. (This way - its
much easiler to apply local changes to updated src.rpm files)

Satish

• References:
  • building kernel rpm from src.rpm
    • From: Kevin Flynn

• Prev by Date: ssh on Fedora Core 2 and HP-UX 11.11
• Next by Date: Re: cheap low-profile pci ethernet adapters
• Previous by thread: building kernel rpm from src.rpm
• Next by thread: ssh on Fedora Core 2 and HP-UX 11.11
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread