Re: Intel Pro 2200BG wireless + WPA-SPK issue?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roger Grosswiler schrieb:
[snip>


sit0: unknown hardware address type 776 sit0: unknown hardware address type 776 Listening on LPF/wlan0/00:0e:35:5b:52:99 Sending on LPF/wlan0/00:0e:35:5b:52:99 Sending on Socket/fallback DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 4 DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 7 DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 11 DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 13 DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 10 DHCPDISCOVER on wlan0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 16 No DHCPOFFERS received. No working leases in persistent database - sleeping.



[root@localhost]# iwlist wlan0 scan
wlan0 Scan completed :
Cell 01 - Address: 00:11:95:2D:06:F2
ESSID:"Madhan"
Protocol:IEEE 802.11g
Mode:Managed
Frequency:2.457GHz (Channel 10)
Quality:0/100 Signal level:-26 dBm Noise level:-256 dBm
Encryption key:on

Hey Madhan,

until yesterday, i had excatly the same issue, therefore i tested first, if my wlan-card could connect to the router without any wep or wpa or whatever. This worked, no problem and was just to make sure, my driver works right.

Afterwards, i tried & tried & tried with all the switches that i found and: finally i got it working with:

- booting the laptop with the card inserted
- as root, in the shell doing:
wpa_supplicant -Dndiswrapper -iwlan0 -c/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -w

the wait switch tell the supplicant to wait until a interface comes up. and then i did:
- ifup wlan0


...this worked (and i wonder, if it's just the -k switch?????????)

afterwards, i tested it several times the same way, it worked perfect. Doing some ftp-tests, i have better performance with ndiswrapper than in windows itself (1800 kbps ndiswrapper, 1600 kbps windoze) in the same environement...

Let me know, if this made your card with wpa working.


HTH Roger

Must be still to early with no coffee, of course i meant the -w (wait) switch, not the -k...sorry for confusion...

Roger


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux