Hi, Thanks a lot Roger for your information. But I have some doubts. As I already mentioned, my Fedora is able to detect my wireless card and work fine without WPA-PSK using the driver for Intel pro 2200BG downloaded from the sourceforge.net. Why do then i need the NDISWrapper again for windows driver(linux driver is ok!!!). Is ONLY WPA_supplicant will not do good in this case? Please light on my thoughts. Thanks Madhan > Madhan Premkumar schrieb: > [snip] >> But that is without security, ie >> router is open to all. But when i set my router to WPA-SPK security, I >> could not connect thereafter. I dont know whether Intel pro 2200BG >> driver >> support WPA-SPK or not. > [/snip] > > Hi Madhan, > > I have the same issue using a D-Link DWL-G650+ with ndiswrapper. This > works quite well, except two issues: > > - freezing (think is because of 4-k-stack) > this is resolvable with some kernels using the 16-k-stack from linuxant > > - WPA > as this d-link-thing never wanted to work well with my barricade under > wep, i used wpa - this works well under windows. in conjunction with > linux/ndiswrapper (or perhaps even your card) i installed the > wpa/wpa2/ieee802.1x-supplicant from here: > http://hostap.epitest.fi/wpa_supplicant/ > > so, all i had to do is installing ndiswrapper (my card has been > recognized on boot-up *yipieeeeeeeeeeeeeeee*), installing ndiswrapper > and the supplicant. > > All you have to do in the supplicant-config is creating a file called > .config, containing: > > CONFIG_DRIVER_NDISWRAPPER=y > > and then do make. copy the executables whereever you want (...and > whereever you gonna find them again...) > > afterwards, create (e.g. in /etc/ a file for your wpa-config), the name > doesn't matter, and i have the following content: > > > network={ > ssid="home" > scan_ssid=1 > key_mgmt=WPA-PSK > psk="very secret passphrase" > } > > shouldn't be a problem, as i just use wpa-psk on my smc 2804wbpr-g > barricade... > > but it doesn't yet work, i let you know, when i get it working.. ;-) > > > Just wrote this, that you perhaps get an idea... > > Roger >
