On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 12:38:17 -0500, Michael J. Pawlowsky <mikep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jay Moore wrote: > > > In my opinion, the ideal would be an OS upgrade every 3-4 years, and/or > > > >some better (more complete?) tools for automating the upgrade process. > >I'm sure this is a pretty difficult thing to do, but I'm into wishful > >thinking today :) > > > > > I have to agree with you there. I''m not really sure what consist of a > major upgrade for FC. > Why not simply call it FC (no numeral) and keep upgrading the packages > an that's it. > > It almost seems like a race simply to get out another major version... > when there seems to be so many little bug fixes improvements that can be > made and still call it FC3 or whatever. > > This seems like a "Commercial Software" cycle thing. Where we need to > get out a version before the 1st quarter of 05 to bring in some revenues > from upgrades. ;-) Yes, I feel we are the tester of a software sometimes. But RedHat is become a commerical software like others. So no choice to continue to use it.... Ringo
