If you want a continually up to date fedora try using rawhide. Up2date will keep it current. I feel there have been several significant internal changes to Fedora to warranty the Core 3 release. I also wouldn't say the core is rushed out, it doesn't always have the latest packages, only the ones deemed stable at testing/release cycle. Regards Andrew On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 01:49 +0800, Wong Kwok-hon wrote: > On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 12:38:17 -0500, Michael J. Pawlowsky > <mikep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jay Moore wrote: > > > > > In my opinion, the ideal would be an OS upgrade every 3-4 years, and/or > > > > > >some better (more complete?) tools for automating the upgrade process. > > >I'm sure this is a pretty difficult thing to do, but I'm into wishful > > >thinking today :) > > > > > > > > I have to agree with you there. I''m not really sure what consist of a > > major upgrade for FC. > > Why not simply call it FC (no numeral) and keep upgrading the packages > > an that's it. > > > > It almost seems like a race simply to get out another major version... > > when there seems to be so many little bug fixes improvements that can be > > made and still call it FC3 or whatever. > > > > This seems like a "Commercial Software" cycle thing. Where we need to > > get out a version before the 1st quarter of 05 to bring in some revenues > > from upgrades. ;-) > > Yes, I feel we are the tester of a software sometimes. > But RedHat is become a commerical software like others. > So no choice to continue to use it.... > > Ringo > -- Andrew Hutchings Systems Operator / Developer / Linux Guru Netserve Consultants Ltd. http://www.domaincity.co.uk/
