Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable

• To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
• From: "eric tanguy" <eric.tanguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:11:49 +0100 (CET)
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <47040.193.52.125.40.1101808888.squirrel@webmail.sciences.univ-nantes.fr> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

> eric tanguy wrote:
>> What's the difference between these 2 repo ?
>
> Sorry, misread the question last time.
>
> The difference is explained at the bottom of http://atrpms.net/
>
> Paul.
So if i understand well all packages from at-stable are included in
at-good (maybe with newer version) ?
Eric

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
    • From: Axel Thimm

• References:
  • RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
    • From: eric tanguy
  • Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
    • From: Paul Howarth

• Prev by Date: Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
• Next by Date: FC 3 + 9000 Series of 3ware
• Previous by thread: Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
• Next by thread: Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread