Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:11:49AM +0100, eric tanguy wrote:
> > eric tanguy wrote:
> >> What's the difference between these 2 repo ?
> >
> > Sorry, misread the question last time.
> >
> > The difference is explained at the bottom of http://atrpms.net/
> >
> > Paul.
> So if i understand well all packages from at-stable are included in
> at-good (maybe with newer version) ?

Yes, less stable repos contain all of their more stable counterparts:

good contains stable
testing contains good and stable
bleeding contains testing, good and stable

So you only need one of them. It doesn't really hurt to have more
repos activated though (only takes more time for the updating).
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpVuc2Fc5OAb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux