Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
From: "eric tanguy" <eric.tanguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:10:34 +0100 (CET)
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <47040.193.52.125.40.1101808888.squirrel@webmail.sciences.univ-nantes.fr> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

> eric tanguy wrote:
>> What's the difference between these 2 repo ?
>
> Sorry, misread the question last time.
>
> The difference is explained at the bottom of http://atrpms.net/
>
> Paul.
Thank you.
Eric

References:
- RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
  - From: eric tanguy
- Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
  - From: Paul Howarth

Prev by Date: Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
Next by Date: Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
Previous by thread: Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
Next by thread: Re: RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux