On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:53:35PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > > I guess the argument is: there's a chance that something got skipped and > > the a kernel got built with the name matching a /boot/config-* file but > > actually with different options -- no risk of that with the /proc approach. > I don't want _my_ RAM being wasted becuase _your_ sysadmin's a twit. If > someone can't keem stuff in /boot sychronised, let him pay the price. Yes, this is a lovely attitude until the twit in question is someone who worked on a system that you suddenly have to fix quickly. Then, suddenly, *you* are paying the price for their mistakes. Like I said, I'm fine with the /boot choice, but I _can_ see a reasonable distinction between a live dump of actual current infomation and an install-time snapshot. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
