On Monday 29 November 2004 01:34, Matthew Miller wrote: > > I guess the argument is: there's a chance that something got skipped and > > > > > the a kernel got built with the name matching a /boot/config-* file but > > > actually with different options -- no risk of that with the /proc > > > approach. > > > > I don't want _my_ RAM being wasted becuase _your_ sysadmin's a twit. If > > someone can't keem stuff in /boot sychronised, let him pay the price. > > Yes, this is a lovely attitude until the twit in question is someone who > worked on a system that you suddenly have to fix quickly. Then, suddenly, > *you* are paying the price for their mistakes. Their bill is bigger. What's the problem? -- Cheers John
