Re: At most 1 running copy

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: At most 1 running copy
• From: Ed Wilts <ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 22:28:47 -0600
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Organization: (ewilts)
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 09:47:47AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> Now we have proper locking, I think we should use it. Even though it's not as 
> good as I had bask then.

Nah, even what we have now sucks compared to the excellent cluster lock
manager on VMS...

-- 
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: At most 1 running copy
    • From: John Summerfield

• References:
  • At most 1 running copy
    • From: Ed Wilts
  • Re: At most 1 running copy
    • From: John Summerfield
  • Re: At most 1 running copy
    • From: fredex
  • Re: At most 1 running copy
    • From: John Summerfield

• Prev by Date: Re: FC2, KDE, ATI: can't move/resize windows on one screen in dual head
• Next by Date: Re: traceroute error !<10>
• Previous by thread: Re: At most 1 running copy
• Next by thread: Re: At most 1 running copy
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread