Re: At most 1 running copy

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: At most 1 running copy
• From: John Summerfield <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:00:43 +0800
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KMail/1.7

On Sunday 28 November 2004 12:28, Ed Wilts wrote:
> > Now we have proper locking, I think we should use it. Even though it's
> > not as good as I had bask then.
>
> Nah, even what we have now sucks compared to the excellent cluster lock
> manager on VMS...

Doubtless, but it beats the heck out of the dreadful kludge we had before.



-- 
Cheers
John

• References:
  • At most 1 running copy
    • From: Ed Wilts
  • Re: At most 1 running copy
    • From: John Summerfield
  • Re: At most 1 running copy
    • From: Ed Wilts

• Prev by Date: Re: FC2, KDE, ATI: can't move/resize windows on one screen in dual head
• Next by Date: Re: Nvidia, Intel, and clout
• Previous by thread: Re: At most 1 running copy
• Next by thread: RE: At most 1 running copy
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread