On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 10:07 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 09:59:31AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 09:35:55 +0100, Peter Boy wrote: > > > > > Am Freitag, den 26.11.2004, 22:36 -0600 schrieb Gustavo Seabra: > > > > > > > > > It did for me! Are you sure you have the right depos listed? > > > > > > I use base, updates-released, atrpms, dag, livna > > > > > > Well, until now I didn't use fedora.us, because they are incompatible to > > > all the other repos in some way. > > > > Or vice versa. Easy as that. > > Oversimplifying once again. > > The situation is not reflexive. Strictly speaking, there are several, mutually exclusive dependency chains: 1. Fedora Core -> Fedora.US -> livna. 2. Fedora Core -> ATrpms 3. Fedora Core -> Freshrpms 4. Fedora Core -> Dag I.e. in general, mixing these repositories does not work. If it currently does for you, it's more or less sheer random luck. > So the statement that fedora.us is not compatible to the rest is far > more descriptive. With all due respect, that's below the belt. Ralf
