Re: kdewebdev / quanta: tidy missing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2004-11-27 at 10:07 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 09:59:31AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 09:35:55 +0100, Peter Boy wrote:
> > 
> > > Am Freitag, den 26.11.2004, 22:36 -0600 schrieb Gustavo Seabra:
> > > > >
> > > > It did for me! Are you sure you have the right depos listed?
> > > 
> > > I use base, updates-released, atrpms, dag, livna
> > > 
> > > Well, until now I didn't use fedora.us, because they are incompatible to
> > > all the other repos in some way.
> > 
> > Or vice versa. Easy as that.
> 
> Oversimplifying once again.
> 
> The situation is not reflexive.

Strictly speaking, there are several, mutually exclusive dependency
chains:

1. Fedora Core -> Fedora.US -> livna.
2. Fedora Core -> ATrpms
3. Fedora Core -> Freshrpms
4. Fedora Core -> Dag

I.e. in general, mixing these repositories does not work.
If it currently does for you, it's more or less sheer random luck.

> So the statement that fedora.us is not compatible to the rest is far
> more descriptive.
With all due respect, that's below the belt.

Ralf



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux