On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 09:59:31AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 09:35:55 +0100, Peter Boy wrote: > > > Am Freitag, den 26.11.2004, 22:36 -0600 schrieb Gustavo Seabra: > > > > > > > It did for me! Are you sure you have the right depos listed? > > > > I use base, updates-released, atrpms, dag, livna > > > > Well, until now I didn't use fedora.us, because they are incompatible to > > all the other repos in some way. > > Or vice versa. Easy as that. Oversimplifying once again. The situation is not reflexive. You have a set of repos that favoured interoperability and compatibility and a repo that started out by dropping these. So the statement that fedora.us is not compatible to the rest is far more descriptive. But you can file in a plea for a fedora.us manifesto change. Although its /dev/null is probably full already ;) > Btw, rpm.livna.org depends on packages from fedora.us as you can > read on the home page. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpqOCZTdxywE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
