-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Peter Cannon wrote:
| On Tuesday 23 November 2004 15:45, Axel Thimm wrote: | |> On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 09:52:16AM -0500, Phil Schaffner wrote: |> |>> On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 09:24 -0500, Mark Bradford wrote: |>> |>>> I have been using apt for installs and updating/upgrading, |>>> but am noticing most of the conversation here seems to favor |>>> yum. Is there any significant difference between the two, or |>>> are there any issues or conflicts in using both? |>> |>> FC3 repositories seem to be dropping apt support, | | | Well I use apt with Synaptic front end without any problems the | list of repos that is installed by default is impressive covering | various RedHat releases. | | With regards to Newbies IMHO this is a better option than yum due | to that dreaded word GUI with Synaptic you can see everything | available at a glance, use it to un-install things and it sorts out | the dependencies it will also select additional packages for | install if required so if a novice selects something and doesn't | realise another bit is needed they wont get in a mess. | | As others have said yumi doesn't work (at the moment) apt offered | to install it and it is installed but it cries about cannot import | client something or other. | Just curious, Has anyone heard of porting Synaptic to work with yum? May be a horrible idea.
MC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEVAwUBQaP85sLEmK4p3PJRAQJcGQf+MAU41W3Y/eFdtZ47af8ClZobpnadeSPv jowgoCTSCJai7TjuKAniTL1ADqlegh+CyZA00khBXEfmo4RnlrH78pm4HH/x8JUx OBQHf9YmskUY6O+zb0mc1JzHokcRXNRD5IQWDWkLtz4HykZgt8iQAG5YKf56LckY R6BsESxFyYPmLoP7CaHdv7uMLeqoBYwhRWUVQxwYF/UuIumeV+v04VnVuNKuvNgc f8vUVNvUVNwCNAlVPJGBjE2ENQ11ZlRt/hNZ2xE1CHCcr4dC9GPBlCy4MxoG8yWE fwDw3sKLDbP4blBJz4X2c/JYR6u3Zkxc70EzpmIPHz3BWIdFS9oazw== =D2mf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
