On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 09:52:16AM -0500, Phil Schaffner wrote: > On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 09:24 -0500, Mark Bradford wrote: > > I have been using apt for installs and updating/upgrading, but am > > noticing most of the conversation here seems to favor yum. Is there any > > significant difference between the two, or are there any issues or > > conflicts in using both? > > FC3 repositories seem to be dropping apt support, Which ones do such things! ??? > and apt does not handle multi-arch (i386 vs x86_64, PPC, ...). True :( > Has been some talk of an apt version able to use the new yum > repository meta-data, but so far seems to be vaporware. Also true, but less painful than the (lack of the) multilib support. > I've pretty much dropped apt in favor of yum, but apt/synaptic still > seem viable for FC2 and earlier. It's also available for FC3, as well as yum/yum20 for FC2 and earlier. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpT7RmKMP63e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
