I would say that most people don't read every e-mail that goes through
a list. It would me sense then that if a user is actually interested
in a post, they will already know what the topic or origional question
is because they most likely read the first message of the thread. I
find it annoying to have to scroll to the bottom of a post that has
five responses to it when there is only a line to read. I agree with Jack when it comes to my location of reply. If they have started in the middle of the set of e-mails, they can scroll down to catch up. Nathaniel Hall, GSEC Intrusion Detection and Firewall Technician Ozarks Technical Community College -- Office of Computer Networking halln@xxxxxxx 417-447-7535 jack wallen wrote: as a top poster i'll add just one thing that seems to be lost on this list - the vast majority of people reading email today have been trained (or ruined) by M$ "rules". whenever i "bottom post" to most people they immediately reply back asking why i replied with a "blank" reply. when i explain to them that the reply is beneath their email they simply say that it doesn't make sense - they know what they said to me. so i've just become accustomed to quoting their text below mine. if they've no idea what i'm replying to they can just scroll down a bit and find out. and since the vast majority of people i email are not old-school as others i doubt that i'll be changing my quoting preferences anytime soon. to each his or her own i say. On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 19:54, James Wilkinson wrote:Drew, Bill wrote:The replies are always at the bottom after the quoted part of the earlier message. This is no the rule on the many other lists I subscribe to. I am more curious as to why this is the case. This is not a complaint at all.-- E-mail address: james | 'Short for "Sic Transit Gloria Humanorum", which is @westexe.demon.co.uk | Latin for "There goes the neighbourhood!"' | -- Menno Willemse |