On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:44:35 +0000, Robin Atwood wrote: > > Does the installer give an example of an absolute link that it's > > complaining about? > > Hmmm, so much for that theory. It actually complains about: > > [root@opal root]# ls -l /usr/tmp > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 Jun 21 20:22 /usr/tmp -> /var/tmp > [root@opal root]# ls -al /var/tmp > total 2434 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 1024 Nov 16 18:17 . > drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 1024 Jun 6 17:31 .. > > which looks quite kosher to me. Any ideas what's throwing it? Apart from wrong permissions, what do you get if you make /usr/tmp a relative link to ../var/tmp? -- Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang) - Linux 2.6.9-1.2_FC2 loadavg: 1.00 1.03 1.03
