On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 06:52 -0700, Brian Richardson wrote: > On 16-Nov-04, at 3:21 AM, Greg Matheson wrote: > > It seems that since FC2 you have to specify /usr/local/lib in > > /etc/ld.so.conf and then run ldconfig. > > [ snip ] > > > Correct me if I'm wrong. > > OK. You're wrong. Now you are wrong :) > /usr/local/lib is not a standard search path, /usr/local/{lib|include} has always been and will probably always be in the standard search path of GCC. > nor is > it in the ld.so.conf in FC1. It is not a standard search path in RH's ld.so configuration. To match ld.so.conf with GCC's expectations, simply add /usr/local/lib to ld.so.conf and make sure it has precedence over /usr/lib. This fact has repeatedly been subject to discussions. Some people consider it to be a bug/inconsistency in all RH-based distributions, others say "/usr/local" is beyond the scope of a distributor's responsibility and therefore consider adding /usr/local/lib to ld.so.conf to be task of a local system administrator ;-) Ralf