On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Paul Howarth wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > so i go back and make a single change to the query, adding the word > > > "color" in the string search summary field. zarro boogs found. > > > > > > as a quick followup, i ducked into the list archives and found: > > > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-November/msg01483.html > > > > still looking. > > Found it by searching for "summary contains: color" on "anaconda" for every > release of Fedora Core, every resolution etc. > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=132381 > marked as a duplicate of: > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=132382 (component=kernel!) and there it is, under "fedora core", "devel". so what's the guidelines for how one selects, say, a release to search under? i mean, if i'm installing FC3 for the first time, and i see this problem for the first time, and i search using what i *think* are reasonably comprehensive search criteria, i still might come up with nothing. what's the policy for how bugs get categorized? if something is still a bug in FC3, should i not expect to find it categorized there in bugzilla? just looking for guidance here. rday
