Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)

• To: Jonathan Berry <berryja@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
• From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:03:12 -0500
• Cc: Elliot Lee <sopwith@xxxxxxxxxx>
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 01:31:10PM -0600, Jonathan Berry wrote:
 > On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:31:26 -0500 (EST), Elliot Lee <sopwith@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 > > The cflags used for i386 packages were:
 > >         -O2 -g -pipe -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=pentium4
 >
 > Out of curiosity, do you know how the x86_64 kernels are compiled as
 > well?  I'll probably do a custom compile, but it'd be something
 > interesting to know.

-Os.

		Dave

• References:
  • FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
    • From: Bryan J. Smith
  • Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
    • From: Elliot Lee
  • Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
    • From: Jonathan Berry

• Prev by Date: Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
• Next by Date: RE: Upgrading from FC1 to FC2
• Previous by thread: Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
• Next by thread: Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread