Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Jonathan Berry <berryja@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 15:03:12 -0500
Cc: Elliot Lee <sopwith@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 01:31:10PM -0600, Jonathan Berry wrote:
 > On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:31:26 -0500 (EST), Elliot Lee <sopwith@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 > > The cflags used for i386 packages were:
 > >         -O2 -g -pipe -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=pentium4
 >
 > Out of curiosity, do you know how the x86_64 kernels are compiled as
 > well?  I'll probably do a custom compile, but it'd be something
 > interesting to know.

-Os.

		Dave

References:
- FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
  - From: Bryan J. Smith
- Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
  - From: Elliot Lee
- Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
  - From: Jonathan Berry

Prev by Date: Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
Next by Date: RE: Upgrading from FC1 to FC2
Previous by thread: Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
Next by thread: Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]