Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
• From: Elliot Lee <sopwith@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:31:26 -0500 (EST)
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Bryan J. Smith wrote:

> Is it still just i686 optimized?
> Or are we targeting P4 optimizations _specifically_ now?
> And how is Athlon (which has a _signficant_ share) performance?

The cflags used for i386 packages were:
	-O2 -g -pipe -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=pentium4

Cheers,
-- Elliot

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
    • From: Jonathan Berry

• References:
  • FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
    • From: Bryan J. Smith

• Prev by Date: ATI rpms
• Next by Date: Re: recovery data from rm command?
• Previous by thread: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
• Next by thread: Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread