Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
From: Elliot Lee <sopwith@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:31:26 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Bryan J. Smith wrote:

> Is it still just i686 optimized?
> Or are we targeting P4 optimizations _specifically_ now?
> And how is Athlon (which has a _signficant_ share) performance?

The cflags used for i386 packages were:
	-O2 -g -pipe -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=pentium4

Cheers,
-- Elliot

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
  - From: Jonathan Berry

References:
- FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
  - From: Bryan J. Smith

Prev by Date: ATI rpms
Next by Date: Re: recovery data from rm command?
Previous by thread: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
Next by thread: Re: FC3 = Pentium 4 scheduler optimized? (or is that still i686?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux