I'll have to speak to management, but I think that they don't want these users to even get a prompt to authenticate (which I'm guessing would be the case if they only had permission to go to foo.com and they tried to go to bar.com). This may be a moot point due to other issues, but I really think I'll need a second, non-authenticating listener. -richard -----Original Message----- From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Hugo Perez Casanova Sent: Fri 10/1/2004 6:56 PM To: For users of Fedora Core releases Cc: Subject: Re: two squid listeners using one configuration? It's all a matter of ACLs. You shouldn't need another squid. Regards. On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 18:08, Duran, Richard wrote: > We'd like to set up a 2nd squid listener on a new port, e.g. 3129, that will allow access to a limited number of sites without the need for login ID authentication. We have a group of employees who aren't given internet usage IDs, but we'd like them to access a few sites during their breaks. Speaking of which, is it possible to configure squid to allow this access only during certain time periods? > > TIA, > -richard ----- IEE José Hugo Pérez Casanova Profesor del Depto. de Ingeniería Electrónica Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz
