Again...it's all a matter of ACLs. You should be able to set up an Access Control List for specific users/systems to not require authentication. On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Duran, Richard wrote: > I'll have to speak to management, but I think that they don't want these users to even get a prompt to authenticate (which I'm guessing would be the case if they only had permission to go to foo.com and they tried to go to bar.com). This may be a moot point due to other issues, but I really think I'll need a second, non-authenticating listener. > > -richard > > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Hugo Perez Casanova > Sent: Fri 10/1/2004 6:56 PM > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > Cc: > Subject: Re: two squid listeners using one configuration? > It's all a matter of ACLs. You shouldn't need another squid. > > Regards. > > On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 18:08, Duran, Richard wrote: > > > We'd like to set up a 2nd squid listener on a new port, e.g. 3129, that will allow access to a limited number of sites without the need for login ID authentication. We have a group of employees who aren't given internet usage IDs, but we'd like them to access a few sites during their breaks. Speaking of which, is it possible to configure squid to allow this access only during certain time periods? > > > > TIA, > > -richard > > ----- > IEE José Hugo Pérez Casanova > Profesor del Depto. de Ingeniería Electrónica > Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz > > > > > -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org To be notified of updates to the web site, visit http://www.bubbanfriends.org/mailman/listinfo/site-update, or send a message to: site-update-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with a message of: subscribe
