Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing

• To: Nifty Hat Mitch <mitch48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
• From: Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:47:20 -0400
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Mail-followup-to: Nifty Hat Mitch <mitch48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Nifty Hat Mitch (mitch48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> I should comment, IMO src rpms should have a longer life than the
> binary.  With a src rpm bits can be rebuilt and differences inspected
> for debugging things.

Ideally, that's what CVS is for. (Yeah yeah, I know. Being worked on - soon!)

Bill

• References:
  • RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
    • From: Bill Nottingham
  • Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
    • From: Christof Damian
  • Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
    • From: Bill Nottingham
  • Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
    • From: Nifty Hat Mitch

• Prev by Date: Re: aic7xx system hangs
• Next by Date: Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
• Previous by thread: Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
• Next by thread: Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread