Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Nifty Hat Mitch <mitch48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
From: Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:47:20 -0400
Cc:
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Mail-followup-to: Nifty Hat Mitch <mitch48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Nifty Hat Mitch (mitch48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> I should comment, IMO src rpms should have a longer life than the
> binary.  With a src rpm bits can be rebuilt and differences inspected
> for debugging things.

Ideally, that's what CVS is for. (Yeah yeah, I know. Being worked on - soon!)

Bill

References:
- RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
  - From: Bill Nottingham
- Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
  - From: Christof Damian
- Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
  - From: Bill Nottingham
- Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
  - From: Nifty Hat Mitch

Prev by Date: Re: aic7xx system hangs
Next by Date: Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
Previous by thread: Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
Next by thread: Re: RFC: cleaning up updates and updates-testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]