Christof Damian (christof@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > At the moment, the Fedora updates tree is somewhat out of hand > > (look, wow - 27G). > > > > Does anyone have any specific and concrete objections to removing > > older, superceded, updates? > > I guess this is just meant for cleaning up the directory and not to > save space? I don't mind the cleanup, but would like the old updates > archived somewhere. It's for both, actually. Frankly, I see no need for archiving of: a) old test updates b) test updates that have been superceded by final updates Others, there could be some use for, I suppose. Bill