On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Bill Nottingham wrote: > At the moment, the Fedora updates tree is somewhat out of > hand (look, wow - 27G). > > Does anyone have any specific and concrete objections to > removing older, superceded, updates? I vote to nukem!! If someone wants them they have been around forever and they ahould be archiving them locally. IMO for the most part they are a waste of space and although disk is cheap when you are running a public mirror it gets expensive after a while. Just my $.02 Tom
