Re: Fedora Core 2 new install -

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



BOB GOODWIN wrote:
> [root@box1 RPMS]# rpm -ivh kernel-2.6.5-1.358.i586.rpm
> warning: kernel-2.6.5-1.358.i586.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 
> 4f2a6fd2
> error: Failed dependencies:
>        module-init-tools is needed by kernel-2.6.5-1.358
>        mkinitrd >= 3.5.5 is needed by kernel-2.6.5-1.358
>        nfs-utils < 1.0.3 conflicts with kernel-2.6.5-1.358
>        initscripts < 7.23 conflicts with kernel-2.6.5-1.358
> 
> And I can't locate "module-init-tools"

On FC2,
# rpm -q mkinitrd nfs-utils initscripts
mkinitrd-3.5.22-1
nfs-utils-1.0.6-22
initscripts-7.55.1-1
> 
> It seems to me there should be no failed dependencies after I ran the 
> Fedora Core 2 "upgrade?"  I guess I could solve all these problems by 
> doing a straight install but I hate to face another week of getting 
> things back to where I want them as I have done too many times before.

Something is very odd here. It looks like you've still got your old RH9
packages around.

At this point, I'd take a good backup. You could try running the FC2
upgrade again.

How, exactly, are your disks organised?

Could you post the output of
fdisk -l /dev/hda
and
for i in $(fdisk -l /dev/hda | egrep ^/dev/ | cut -d\  -f1) ; do echo $i ;
e2label $i 2>/dev/null ; done
and /etc/fstab?

(If you have any other disks, can you do the same for them?)

(Does anyone know of a better way of showing which devices have which
labels? At this time of night, I can't think of one...)

James.

-- 
E-mail address: james | "Right lads, we've got 45 minutes to score 37 goals.
@westexe.demon.co.uk  | No problem with that -- the other team just did."



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux