Am So, den 22.08.2004 schrieb Kellie Blackwell um 22:55: > >cat /proc/interrupts > > CPU0 > 0: 4692579: XT-PIC timer > 1: 2881: XT-PIC i8042 > 2: 0: XT-PIC cascade > 5: 95: XT-PIC uhci_hcd > 8: 1: XT-PIC rtc > 10: 1: XT-PIC EMU10K1 > 12: 74970: XT-PIC i8042 > 14: 17812: XT-PIC ide0 > 15: 42972: XT-PIC ide1 > NMI: 0: > ERR: 0: > > Interesting! Where did IRQ 11 go that was mentioned in the messages file? I do not see the "natsemi" module loaded there. Make sure /etc/modprobe.conf has following line alias eth0 natsemi > >cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 > > DEVICE=eth0 > ONBOOT=yes > BOOTPROTO=none > USERCTL=no > NAME='ethernet LAN card" The quotes are unbalanced. Put a # in front of the NAME line. > IPADDR=192.168.1.20 > NETMASK=255.255.255.0 > BROADCAST=192.168.1.255 > NETWORK=192.168.1.0 > GATEWAY=192.168.1.1 > PEERDNS=yes > > Steve. So what happens if running "modprobe -v natsemi" in the syslog? Run a second terminal with "tail -f /var/log/messages" to see that in parallel to loading the module. Does the eth0 then use an IRQ? "service network restart" should activate eth0 and show it in "ifconfig" output. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp Serendipity 23:14:17 up 2 days, 18:56, load average: 0.45, 0.35, 0.26
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
