Re: Missing lo entry in routing table in FC2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Missing lo entry in routing table in FC2
From: Ian Laurie <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:54:43 +1000
In-reply-to: <20040806082848.GA16013@server> (from [email protected] on Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 18:28:48 +1000)
References: <20040805212844.GA13109@server> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <20040806082848.GA16013@server>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

O> I have an FC1 and FC2 system side-by-side.  Network scripts for loopback look
> to be the same.
> 
> Its weird, the route is missing..... yet it seems to be working :)
> 
> Still investigating.

Can't figure it out.

http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=129365

Ian

References:
- Missing lo entry in routing table in FC2
  - From: Ian Laurie
- Re: Missing lo entry in routing table in FC2
  - From: jludwig
- Re: Missing lo entry in routing table in FC2
  - From: Alexander Dalloz
- Re: Missing lo entry in routing table in FC2
  - From: jludwig
- Re: Missing lo entry in routing table in FC2
  - From: Ian Laurie

Prev by Date: Logitech MX500 on FC2
Next by Date: Synaptics touchpad question
Previous by thread: Re: Missing lo entry in routing table in FC2
Next by thread: Re: Missing lo entry in routing table in FC2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]