On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 14:54 +0100, Douglas Furlong wrote:
> Good afternoon.
>
> Some one mentioned several months ago, that there is a "standard" way of
> having signatures appear on an email, so that when replying the original
> signature is stripped, and as such prevents constant duplication of
> redundant data.
>
> I thought this was stipulated by having "-- " in a line of it's own
> above the signature, but that does not appear to work. If any one knows
> of an RFC on this, I would appreciate a link to it (I had a quick look
> but couldn't find any thing).
I just want to check that there is no "strange" attachment to my email other then the gpg signature?
I've just got a bounce with the following subject.
Subject:
Symantec Mail Security detected that
you sent a message containing a
suspicious attachment.
(SYM:02629890341371604646)
Personally I hate it when people put the entire message in the subject.
Any way, just making sure that no one else is seeing any thing "funny".
--
Douglas Furlong
Systems Administrator
Firebox.com
T: 0870 420 4475
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
