On Jul 20, 2004 at 15:03, Douglas Furlong in a soothing rage wrote: >On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 14:54 +0100, Douglas Furlong wrote: >> Good afternoon. >> >> Some one mentioned several months ago, that there is a "standard" way of >> having signatures appear on an email, so that when replying the original >> signature is stripped, and as such prevents constant duplication of >> redundant data. >> >> I thought this was stipulated by having "-- " in a line of it's own >> above the signature, but that does not appear to work. If any one knows >> of an RFC on this, I would appreciate a link to it (I had a quick look >> but couldn't find any thing). That would depend on the MUA used. I use pine and all such .sigs get stripped from my replies. I know that with Groupwise up to version 6.4 this is not the case. Or at least I can't get it to strip .sigs, add '>' for lines quoted and put the cursor at the bottom of the msg. >I just want to check that there is no "strange" attachment to my email other then the gpg signature? Apart from line length I got it fine. > >I've just got a bounce with the following subject. > > Subject: >Symantec Mail Security detected that >you sent a message containing a >suspicious attachment. >(SYM:02629890341371604646) I suspect that this is a virus that was sent from someone who had your e-mail address in their addressbook. That's the in thing these for viruses and worms... N.Emile... -- Registered Linux User # 125653 (http://counter.li.org) Switch to: http://www.speakeasy.net/refer/190653 narcolepulacyi, n.: The contagious action of yawning, causing everyone in sight to also yawn. -- "Sniglets", Rich Hall & Friends 10:09:38 up 22 days, 3:24, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00
