Re: Spamass-milter vs Milter-Spamc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Fr, den 02.07.2004 schrieb Ow Mun Heng um 2:45:

> Spamass-milter seems to work OK except that I it doesn't really _yet_
> know how to differentiate spam & Ham

Save at least 200 SPAM and 200 HAM mails and then run manually sa-learn
to initialize the bayes database.

> This is what I have in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
> 
> required_hits                   5
> rewrite_subject                 1
> subject_tag                     [N-SPAM]
> report_safe                     0
> use_bayes                       1
> bayes_path                      /var/run/.spamassassin
> 
> Note : I did not turn on additional stuffs. just the above. I'm hoping I
> don't have to and get the Bayes filter to do it.
> 
> (but somehow autolearn is off in the headers)
> $ ps awux | grep spam
> root      spamass-milter -p /var/run/spamass.sock -f -r 15 -u defaultuser
> spamd /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -a -m5 -u spamd -x
> 
> Am I doing everything right here?

Autolearning only happens up from specific SPAM values, which are
defined in the default rule files. IIRC SPAM is only autolearned from 15
points and above.

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.6.6-1.435.2.1 
Serendipity 03:23:57 up 6:48, 8 users, 1.49, 0.69, 0.49 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux