-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 20 June 2004 4:41 pm, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: > On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 09:32 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > My argument for proftpd or pure-ftpd is their capability to use FTP > > > with TLS.... > > > > ok, two votes for proftpd. that's a consensus, i guess. i just did a > > quick search and found the RPM proftpd-1.2.10rc1-1.fc1.i386.rpm. since > > it installed nicely, i'm going to assume that the "fc1" part is not going > > to be an issue with it running on FC2, although i haven't had a chance to > > test it yet. unless someone has a strong opinion on which build and > > version should be used on FC2. > > proftpd has historically had many security problems (probably due to the > many more features). > > ftp is braindead anyway, if you have to use a daeon, use one with the > least ammount of features possible. > I think the kernel.org FTP uses vsftpd > Rui -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA1ZfE2FHsOWMJBKMRAhbJAKC2ncrm3npvm3CS8tax90KGTUdVXACg7VvM QiWQFEaCz2UZBzxpJjn19No= =KniO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
