Am So, den 20.06.2004 schrieb Robert P. J. Day um 15:32: > ok, two votes for proftpd. that's a consensus, i guess. i just did a > quick search and found the RPM proftpd-1.2.10rc1-1.fc1.i386.rpm. since it > installed nicely, i'm going to assume that the "fc1" part is not going to > be an issue with it running on FC2, although i haven't had a chance to > test it yet. unless someone has a strong opinion on which build and > version should be used on FC2. > > rday I won't recommend using a release candidate (RC1). If you search for an RPM I can recommend from own experience the package by freshrpms.net http://tettnang.freshrpms.net/rpm.html?id=206 It is build for FC2 (Tettnang) and comes with a good and solid default setup / proftpd.conf. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.6.6-1.435 Serendipity 15:54:54 up 21:42, 8 users, 0.55, 0.53, 0.50
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
