On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 09:32 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > ... > > My argument for proftpd or pure-ftpd is their capability to use FTP with > > TLS.... > > ok, two votes for proftpd. that's a consensus, i guess. i just did a > quick search and found the RPM proftpd-1.2.10rc1-1.fc1.i386.rpm. since it > installed nicely, i'm going to assume that the "fc1" part is not going to > be an issue with it running on FC2, although i haven't had a chance to > test it yet. unless someone has a strong opinion on which build and > version should be used on FC2. proftpd has historically had many security problems (probably due to the many more features). ftp is braindead anyway, if you have to use a daeon, use one with the least ammount of features possible. Rui
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
