(Netiquette note: when you're responding to a digest, it's a good idea to change the subject back to something useful). Parameshwara Bhat wrote: > Yes,that does work.But what I was looking for was not just meeting an > actual need.But a technological question as to why Linux can't do it or > doesn't do it or hasn't thought fo doing it ? What you suggest is a two > way work .But Winzip has been spanning floppies for many years and it > appears so simple a task in Windows.Why this feature not in Linux ? I > guess because of it's clumsy mount and unmount ? It's more a philosophical point. In old-school Unix, the philosophy was to provide pipelines where other OSes might have provided options in the programs. A sysadmin might have unhesitatingly recommended [1]: tar cf - file* | compress | split -b1440000 - out.Z. and rationalised that now you knew how to compress and split the output of any program. It's slightly more complicated, but much more flexible. So you aren't limited to what your application programmer thought to put into a program. In old-school Unix, if necessary, one would write a script to automate that and the copying of the files onto floppies. But any sysadmin worthy of the name should be able to knock that up in ten minutes: it's not something that would be provided with the OS, and it's simpler to write it yourself than to go looking for one, even now. And the sysadmin would expect to customize it for the site's requirements. In the world of GNOME and KDE, of course the philosophy is to provide user-friendly front ends for the common things. And if this was a common thing, these days, I'm sure it would be provided in something like file-roller. But, honestly, floppies have never been common on Unix-like systems. On multi-user systems, only the sysadmin might expect to get near the floppy drive. All such systems should have tape drives or network access to them, and the increased capacity and reliability of tape over floppy made it the removable media of choice, especially for more data than would fit on a single floppy. There was a time, I suppose, when low cost Linux PCs might have used floppies more, but the advent of USB sticks, CD-R/W and ubiquitous Internet access mean that many PCs neither have nor need a floppy drive. Apart for booting purposes, it's been years since I last used a floppy, and eight years since I needed to span zip files across floppies. So, really, no-one's done it because no-one's really seen that the need is worth the work. I don't think it's due to mount / umount: a program can call those automatically. James. [1] This is old-school, remember. The command line won't work on Fedora (no compress). -- E-mail address: james@ | "We already have a device for finding old coins of westexe.demon.co.uk | low value - it's called a collection plate..." | -- Caption to a Church Times cartoon